The Space Show
The Space Show
The Space Show focuses on timely and important issues influencing the development of outer-space commerce, space tourism,space exploration and space development. The Space Show is committed to facilitating our becoming a space-faring nation and society with a growing and self-sustaining space-faring economy. The Space Show also focuses on other related subjects of interest to us all.
Station feed:  Created by: David Livingston |
Created on: 12 May 2005 Language: English |
| << < 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 > >> | |
| Add this to another station |
Dr. Paul Dear 3-26-10 (59.71MB; download) -- Guest: Dr. Paul Dear. Topics: N-Prize, genetics and DNA. Dr. Paul Dear returned to The Space Show for important N-Prize updates in addition to an informative science discussion. For information about the N-Prize, please visit www.n-prize.com. In our first segment, Dr. Dear went over the basics of the N-Prize with us including teams, rules, costs, and regulatory issues. He explained there were two tracks, the reusable track and the regular track and there is a prize for each section. We talked about balloon launch Rockoons, rocket guns, and more. Dr. Dear brought up the issue of cubesats which we discussed in some detail. Later in this segment regulatory and ITAR issues with respect to the N-Prize were discussed. We started the second segment with a call from Charles in Mojave who told us his personal N-Prize story and the value he was getting from participating in the contest. There was also a brief discussion of religion and space. Don't miss it. In this segment we talked about genetic modification of specific human genes for long duration spaceflight and settlement. Dr. Dear had much to say about DNA and the subject of genetic modification. This is an interesting discussion that you will definitely want to hear. The subject of DNA and Mammoths came up as that is part of the biological work Dr. Dear does in his Cambridge lab. In the third segment, we opened up with a discussion on the extinct marsupial, Tylacine, then we talked about reconstituting the RNA of the Spanish Flu. Again, don't miss this discussion. I asked if biology and some of the subjects we have been talking about overlapped with space fields. Listen to what Dr. Dear had to say about this. Later in this segment, a listener asked about the website www.halfbakery.com. Make sure you listen to what Dr. Dear said about it and also make sure you visit the website. We then talked about indicators of crackpot science and Dr. Dear suggested that if the basic rules and laws were being ignored or distorted, the theory was likely a crackpot theory. In the fourth and final segment, we talked about regulation and safety issues and listeners asked more about men and women as part of the N-Prize teams. As you will hear, the N-Prize structure stays away from the regular world, leaving it to the nations of the contestants. Launch requirements came to our attention as did the rocket equation and launching near the equator. A listener asked if an N-Prize entry could beam solar power to Earth using a small mirror. He said probably but that it would be very low in power and ineffective other than perhaps seeing it as it goes by overhead. If you have a question or comment for Dr. Paul Dear, please contact him at info@n-prize.org. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:29:25 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Steve Landeene, Tuesday, 3-23-10 (45.02MB; download) -- Guest: Steve Landeene. Topics: Spaceport America and spaceport activities in general. Steve Landeene, Executive Director of Spaceport America, was our guest to discuss Spaceport America and our civil and commercial space policy and spaceports in general. We started our first segment with a general overview of Spaceport America in New Mexico and its primary tenant, Virgin Galactic. Steve brought us current with the construction activities underway at the spaceport, including the 10,000 by 200 foot runway which should be completed around June 2010. He told us some of the history of the area and the spaceport and responded to some questions about the commercial infrastructure which will eventually support spaceport operations. I asked Steve if the spaceport would be able to allow general aviation planes to land and he said those discussions were underway but there were several general aviation airports nearby including one at Hatch, Truth or Consequences, and in Las Cruces. Listener Tom wanted to know the spaceport's plans for using green energy. Listen to how the spaceport is being constructed to include environmental and green technology from the ground up. In addition, he said there was a possibility for some geothermal energy, solar, and solar thermal. The use of bio fuels was also a possibility. I asked Steve about the NM financing for Spaceport America and how that financing was holding up given the recession. Listen to what he had to say about the financing and its status as its most interesting and positive. At the end of this segment, I asked him for his five year plan for Spaceport America. You don't want to miss what he had to say for five years out. We started the second segment with questions about New Mexico and the adoption of limited or no liability laws as has been the case in Virginia and Florida. Steve talked about the recent NM legislative passage of the Informed Consent Law and the use of the limited liability approach, he talked about the correctness of using the term spaceflight participant instead of passenger, and the Spaceport Council where the spaceports are working together to forge a common set of solutions to common problems. Listen to what he said when asked if there were too many spaceports given that as of yet there are no suborbital spaceflights. Steve then talked about their sister spaceport, Spaceport Sweden, and the ESRANGE test range plus the Ice Hotel. I also got him to describe his stay at the Ice Hotel. A Los Angeles listener asked Steve about a backup plan in case Virgin Galactic's business does not turn out as expected. Listen to the Plan B Steve discussed with us. We started the final segment with a discussion on the new space policy proposals for the NASA 2011 budget. Steve believes these proposals to represent the proper path and the switch to commercial launch systems represents the future of our space policy. He talked at length about both Orbital Sciences and Space X as well as going over some of the problems associated with the POR/Constellation. During this discussion, we talked about markets, risk, and the proper role of government in building infrastructure and buying down some of the commercial risk. Later in this segment, I asked Steve how many launch days are typical in this part of New Mexico and the answer was about 340 days a year. Toward the end of the segment, he fielded questions about the El Camino Real Trail and the steps they took to work with the environmental groups that wanted to be sure to preserve the trail. Their approach was an outstanding one leading to success. Listen to this discussion as I believe this approach could easily be used by others in similar situations. If you have a question or comment for Steve Landeene, please email him at Steve.Landeene@state.nm.us. For additional information about Spaceport America, please visit their website at http://www.spaceportamerica.com. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:42:39 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Eduardo Jezierski, Monday, 3-22-10 (42.73MB; download) -- Guest: Eduardo Jezierski. Topics: Emergency and disaster relief and the roll of space resources. Our guest today, Eduardo Jezierski of InSTEDD (www.instedd.org) talked with us about disaster and emergency relief around the world, how technology is used, brought into remote areas, and the role space resources plays in bringing help to the areas that have been hit by a disaster such as Haiti with the recent earthquake. This program unfolded in three segments but our conversation was a continuous theme so this summary will not reflect the actual segments since our themes overlapped throughout the entire show. Eduardo started out describing an emergency situation, Haiti for example, how resources were deployed, who deployed them, how all teams going to the site were self-contained with resources, power, etc. Much of what was and is used is very advanced technology to achieve bandwidth so note what he had to say about beach ball like inflatable antennas and other very advanced technology. We were introduced to BarCamps which we discussed at length and which The Space Show is now considering doing along with help from Eduardo. If you want to know more about BarCamps, check out this introductory Wiki site, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BarCamp. Eduardo received questions about bandwidth issues, generating power and even the use of space solar power. You will want to hear what he had to say about these subjects. As our discussion evolved, we talked more and more about space awareness issues among the emergency organizations as well as the people in the countries needing the help. Compare what you hear to the average space awareness of the general population in the US or your own country. Later in the show, Eduardo talked about the importance of going to space and as you will hear, he connected dots differently from what we space cadets normally here and the case we normally make for spaceflight. He said that being space fairing means better community living here on Earth. Learning to live in space and supporting space life support systems help our ability to live a better life here on this planet. We discussed this at length throughout the show so make sure you hear our discussion in full. What do you think? We then talked about the cost of the space program and the idea that space funds should be spent to help people on Earth with food, etc. Eduardo talked about the need for portfolio planning and what space expenditures mean for people here on Earth. Again, listen carefully to this discussion. Text messaging, satellite imaging, innovation and even risk taking were all part of this discussion. Toward the end of the show I asked our guest about the view of the night sky in the countries he goes to for emergency and disaster relief. We also asked about people looking up and their awareness of the night sky and space. Eduardo had some very interesting things to say about this. I believe this to be a very important, interesting, and even fascinating discussion. If you have any questions or comments for Eduardo Jezierski, you can email him at edjez@instedd.org. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:39:08 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Dr. Paul Spuids, Sunday, 3-21-10 (49.27MB; download) -- Guest: Dr. Paul Spudis. Topics: U.S Space Policy, space vision. Dr. Paul Spudis, Senior Staff Scientist with the Lunar and Planetary Institute, was our guest for this program to discuss the Administration's space policy proposals and the need for a vision for space development. In the first of two segments, we talked about space vision and goals which according to Dr. Spudis, must include a destination. Much of our discussion was focused on the need for a destination but he said several times that the problem with the VSE was that the focus was on getting to the destination (the Moon for example) but not what to do once we were at the destination. Dr. Spudis said that we must know not only where we are going but what we will do once we are there. If that is not known and cannot be explained to the people and Congress, and NASA itself, the vision will simply not work. In referencing the Augustine Commission report, he said the basic assumption that Constellation was not fixable was flawed. He also suggested that the Report over estimated the cost of options and did not look at stretching out the program to hold down up front costs though such a method increases overall project costs over time. Dr. Spudis put forth the reasons for returning to the Moon which he said were to learn to do things in space and use INSITU resources. A listener also made the point that the Moon was actually one place we could go to and work using chemical propulsion. When asked about the switch to commercial rockets, he said he was not wedded to a particular launch solution and supported using commercial rockets but his focus was on getting to the Moon for learning to live and work in space. He said we needed to learn and develop the new skills. This theme was repeated throughout the show today. Listener John called in form Atlanta regarding the Shuttle and even said the new policy was calculated to destroy human spaceflight. I asked both John and Dr. Spudis about this through the balance of the first segment so listen to this discussion. As you will hear, its hard for me to imagine any president or administration wanting to be the party that destroyed human spaceflight. As we started the second segment, Dr. Spudis repeated the argument that the Moon was useful and brought in the fact that water was present on the Moon. Another listener asked about VASIMIR but Dr. Spudis commented on the need for a 12 m/w nuclear reactor in space as a complicating factor. Dr. Spudis also mentioned "Happy Talk" from NASA. Listen to this discussion. Later in the segment, Dr. Spudis talked about three factions in NASA and how NASA operates. Don't miss this discussion. He urged interested parties to contact and talk with their elected representatives and to get involved in the process. For those of you interested, you can hear Dr. Spudis at the Asimov Panel on space destinations at www.amnh.org/news/2010/03/podcast-isaac-asimov-debate/. Dr. Spudis has a website at www.spudislunarresources.com. Paul's blog is http://blogs.airspacemag.com/moon/. The article we mentioned during the show, "The New Space Race," can be found at www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1376. If you have a comment or question for Dr. Paul Spudis, please email him at spudis@lpi.usra.edu. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:56:24 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Peter Homer, Friday, 3-19-10 (61.95MB; download) -- Guest: Peter Homer. Topics: NASA Centennial Challenges, spacesuits, technology innovation. Peter Homer was our guest for this program. Peter is the President and Founder of FLAGSUIT LLC and has twice won the NASA Astronaut Glove Centennial Challenge. For more information, visit www.flagsuit.com. In our first segment, Peter discussed the NASA Centennial Challenge program and introduced us to his astronaut glove which has won two competitive Centennial Challenge competitions. Peter went into detail to tell us what was special and unique about his glove including the material, the fabric hinges, and more. We discuss spacesuit sewing, materials, bladders, flexibility, and manufacturing costs. Don't miss this discussion. In response to listener as well as a question from me, Peter talked about air leaks in the glove or the spacesuit, sewing needle holes, bladder requirements, duck tape, and makeup gas. In the second segment, Anthony asked if an astronaut needed help donning the glove or his version of a spacesuit. The answer was no. We started discussing the business potential of the spacesuits and he said they were still out there in terms of being market ready but there were other commercial markets that could be exploited sooner. Peter then described his hyperbaric suit concept, his timing for prototype and product to market. We talked at length about his full body hyperbaric suit, including coverings for feet and head. I asked if covering the head would lead to claustrophobia so listen to his answer as this is a problem for many people. We talked about his funding requirements what was needed to go through prototype to market which he estimated would be around $1 million. In the third segment, we discussed the aerospace industry in the state of Main. You might be surprised by what you find out about this industry in this state. We also discussed the various pressures used for spacesuits and what they mean for pre-breathing to avoid the bends and more. Listen to what he said happened to the flexibility of his glove at 10 PSI! We talked about the use of launch and reentry suits for space tourism companies. The problem of heat and movement was addressed as well as other issues. I asked Peter to tell us how he got interested in spacesuit and glove development. The administration's space policy was discussed and he said that assuming it passes, the emphasis on commercial helps all commercial enterprises including his by showing that NASA endorses the private and entrepreneurial effort in space development. A listener asked about his suit providing radiation shielding which it does not. In the fourth and final segment, Peter told us about participating in the Space Investment Summit 7 recently held in Boston. Listen to what he said the benefit was for attending. He was also asked about participating in the famous Rice University Business Plan Competition and about the MIT mechanical counter-pressure suit development program. Peter had much to say about the counter-pressure suit so listen carefully. In addition, we compared US spacesuits with Russian and Chinese spacesuit manufacturing. Toward the end of the segment we talked about innovation, failure, and the path from Power Point or Viewgraph to a real project in development. As you will hear, nothing ever goes smoothly and you don't know what you don't know until you start building something to make it work. This is really an important discussion so listen sharply to what Peter has to say on this topic. Peter stressed innovation as being his important Pearl of Wisdom thought that he wanted to leave with us today. If you have a question or comment for Peter Homer, please email him at peter@flagsuit.com. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:54:43 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Col.(Res.) Yorham Ilan-Lipovsky, Wednesday, 3-17-10 (35.31MB; download) -- Guest: Col (Res.) Yorham Ilan-Lipovsky. Topic: Space issues in Israel and related topics. This program was recorded during the evening of March 10, 2010 at the Responsive Space 8 Conference at Los Angeles. While Col. Ilan-Lipovsky was part of the live audience Tuesday Space Show Responsive Space program, we thought it important to sit down with him for a one on one discussion about space and related issues with Israel and the region. There are no breaks in our discussion which is just short of an hour in length. We covered many topics and as you will hear, space in Israel and for the average Israeli is something different than what we typically think about here in the States. Yorham talked about strategic and national security space and how the Israelis see, value, and work with space. When asked about space tourism, commercial space and other similar issues, we got a different perspective and take than we would were the conversation being held with a space enthusiast or advocate in the US or elsewhere. I asked about the average person's space awareness level in Israel and about STEM and related education in Israel. You might find surprises in his response. For sure, you will find Col. Ilan-Lipovsky's interview to be very interesting. Do you think its possible we in the States take much for granted? I believe this program to be both informative and most important because we see space in a way we don't often see it or even think about it. While all the characteristics of space that we talk about all the time are present in Israel, those same qualities and characteristics, because of the unique conditions and circumstances Israel faces and its geographical region, well, there is clearly a different emphasis. Space means much to their survival over other issues. Your feedback and comments on this discussion are most welcome. If you want to send your comments or questions to Yoram Ilan-Lipovsky, please do so through me at drspace@thespaceshow.com and I will forward your note to him. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:56:01 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Michael Heartsong, Tuesday, 3-16-10 (53.07MB; download) -- Guest: Michael Heartsong. Topics: Mining asteroids for commercial purposes. Michael Heartsong of Promethean Enterprises, Inc. was our guest to talk about the Promethean Project, "Mining The Sky." Promethean has an extensive White Paper on this subject which you can download at http://www.miningthesky.com/brochure.html. In our first segment, Mr. Heartsong outlined their mining concept to address both NEO's as well as comets. You will want to pay careful attention to his plan and how "targets of opportunity" will be selected. For the time being, they are not talking about mining the Moon. He also addressed the long term payout problem for raising capital as the project would be incrementally staged over perhaps 40 years or longer. Listen to his plan on how to establish early financial returns on additional income streams with three years and five years. As you will hear, some of the mining venture projects will start showing a payoff within 10-15 years. Michael outlines his customers which he says includes the ISS, anybody with a GEO satellite wanting to refuel it and also structural needs for the ISS. Bill form Virginia asked a series of questions about launcher, markets, time lines, and more. Michael responded to Bill's questions during the balance of this segment. Before this segment ended, Marshall asked about the spin of an asteroid and how that impacted the mining operation. College student Daniel ask about communication delays in controlling a robot and that became a continuing story line through the balance of today's interview. As we started the second segment, Tim from Huntsville called in and talked about propellant depots, aero braking, and more. 3D Rapid Prototyping was also mentioned to Michael as a possibility for consideration with his mining project. Michael then discussed options to deal with an incoming asteroid on a collision course with Earth so listen to how he summarized the options known so far. He said his project might be able to do some mining on a risky NEO such as Apotheosis and at the same time, play a role in deflecting it. Don't miss this discussion. Later in this segment, Michael was asked how changes in our national space policy as proposed by the administration on Feb. 1, 2010 might impact his project. He said he was generally supportive of the changes as it helps commercial space and his project is definitely a commercial project to be funded by the private sector, not the government. He had much to say on this topic so don't miss it. ITAR came up in the context of Michael being able to talk to potential foreign investors. Later in the segment, Trent asked about the types of asteroids that would make the best targets and wanted to know if a "wet" one was better. Michael talks about the three types of asteroids and makes it clear as to what type would be best for his project. We had a question about how his chances for financing would be impacted by the domestic and global economy problems, plus the probable down rating of US and UK treasury bonds. This led to a discussion on this subject first by Michael, then I joined in. Michael was asked for his initial plan and implementation schedule which he provided, including letting us know that he first needs to raise about $12-$15 million of angel capital to fund the research phase of his project. While this discussion took place earlier in this segment, it was a continuous theme throughout the balance of the interview. If you have a comment or question for Michael Heartsong or you want to get involved or just get more information, please contact him directly at msheartsong8@gmail.com. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:49:33 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Henry Vanderbil, Monday, 3-15-10 (44.44MB; download) -- Guest: Henry Vanderbilt. Topic: Space Access Society upcoming conference and agenda. Henry Vanderbilt, founder of the Space Access Society and the Space Access Conference was our guest for this show to discuss the upcoming SA Conference in Phoenix, Arizona from April 8-10, 2010. For more information, please visit www.space-access.org. In our first segment, Henry took us through the origins of the Space Access Society, how he came to found the organization and then do the annual conferences to bring people together to discuss how to accomplish radically different space transportation costs. This is an important history so don't miss it as it paves the way for the modern Space Access Society and its success as well as popularity. Also in this segment, we talked about space budgets and Henry said that if commercial space access costs were X, then the DOD would be perhaps 3X. NASA would then be about 10X! Listen to his full comments on this subject. Toward the end of this segment, Henry was talking about Space X, COTS and Orbital Sciences. As we started the second segment, Henry continued talking about Space X and the Falcon 9, then Orbital Sciences and the development of the Taurus 2 rocket as well as the NASA CCDEV program Commercial Crew Development. Constellation and Ares 1 were discussed and then Henry started talking about some of the speakers and conference content. You can see the full list of speakers and subjects by visiting the Space Access Society website at the address above. Scroll down to the section "Confirmed SA'10 speakers and presentations so far." Later in this segment, we talked at some length about laser power transmission via the upcoming talk by Dr. Jordin Kare and Lasermotive. Dallas then called the show to mention some hurdles for the space elevator including the need for two-way traffic and more. Dallas also talked about the panel discussion planned for orbital propellant depots. In the third and final segment, we continued our discussion with Dallas and Henry regarding both the elevator and the propellant depots. Later in this segment, Henry was asked about heavy lift and returning to the Moon. As you will hear, Henry talked in some detail about the Nasa exploration policy. This is a must hear discussion. Toward the end of the segment, the subject of world space programs came up and as you will hear, SA 10 is a US-centric conference but there is a panel discussion on various world space programs. Heavy lift was the topic as we neared the end of the show. If you have comments or questions for Henry Vanderbilt or want to know more about the Space Access conference, please email him through the website using space.access@space-access.org. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:09:29 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Dr. Bruno Stanek, Sunday, 3-14-10 (54.58MB; download) -- Guest: Dr. Bruno Stanek. Topics: How the Swiss and Europeans view new US space policy proposals. Dr. Bruno Stanek returned as our guest to share his perspectives and what is reported in the Swiss and some of the European media regarding America's proposed space policy and Program of Record in this nearly two hour program. In our first segment, Dr. Stanek talked about the Swiss media and reports that America was killing the human spaceflight program. He said too many people see us as doing nothing. This change in perspective has shocked many people. He also mentioned that having the goal of going to Mars with chemical propulsion was not something that would likely happen and that we need nuclear propulsion. He commented that VASIMR seems very promising. He then explained that if cost was the problem as the Administration and Augustine reported, why plan for a mission that is ten times the cost of going to the Moon which he suggested we needed to do to learn to live in space and perfect needed technologies. He then talked about the space policy proposals and said it was a bad decision to always have policy that stops and goes all the time. A listener asked Dr. Stanek about commercialization/privatization. Our guest said if it was easy, why has it not been done before? He suggested that the private industry was both inexperienced and facing serious technical issues and that basic research was needed but do it in parallel to doing NASA spaceflight. It does not have to be one way or the other. He advocated pursuing both tracks at the same time. Later in this segment we discussed the SRB versus the Liquid Rocket Engine issue, escape hardware, and the POGO Effect for all rockets. Dr. Stanek is supportive of the SRB so you will want to note his comments. In the second segment, we talked about the space awareness level of the general population in Switzerland. While comparing the Swiss population to the US population is not an apples and apples comparison, it appears that those in Switzerland have more awareness than the average American. Their education focuses more on space and related topics than our systems seem to do. Later in the segment, John called in from Atlanta to talk about the need for a true space transportation system to LEO. Make sure you hear this discussion. Our topics then switched to what it takes to inspire and motivate people. Bruno said that when you have a goal, its much easier and better to inspire and motivate. We then talked about the Augustine Commission and he said it was formed around the cost issue so it framed the problems and the solutions as a function of cost. He provided some alternative perspectives to how we view space development outside of the cost arena and mentioned the leadership of the great Kraft Ehricke . In our third and final segment, Bruno talked about making budget changes within NASA and Constellation. We talked about the need for real science and the problem throughout societies that are scientifically illiterate. This led to a question about the bogus and even corrupt science we are now hearing about regarding global warming. I asked about space tourism and space advocacy in Switzerland. Ted asked him what our space program would look like should the administration's program be put into law. Bruno suggested changes showing up in about ten year. He also cited Swiss and European experience in many things the US is now considering, not just for space, but for healthcare, drug experience, and more. He commented that these were disasters and he urged America not to follow in these directions and to pay attention to the models that show what happens with certain policies. Toward the end of the program, Charles from Mojave called in to talk about the Microlauncher analog with the personal computer. Don't miss what Dr. Stanek had to say about this concept. If you want to send Dr. Bruno Stanek a question or a comment, please do so at bruno@stanek.ch. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:33 UTC
|
| Add this to another station |
Responsive Space 8 Interviews, Friday, 3-12-10 (41.90MB; download) -- Guest: Joe Cardin; Dr. Steve Harrington. Topics: space policy, workforce issues, marketing, customers. During our initial segment, our guest, Joe Cardin of VACCO Industries provides us with a unique perspective regarding the impact associated with the new space policy budget proposals announced Feb. 1 of this year. Mr. Cardin brings to our discussion a new and different set of perspectives and possible outcomes. Our discussion covered many topics from the cost of manufacturing space certified hardware to the market saying it wants something else, especially something cheaper. We talk about NASA policy, contract requirements, and much more. Workforce issues, motivation, productivity, all of these issues were part of this conversation. Don't miss this discussion as its unique and brings into play many important issues not normally talked about or even thought about. In our second segment, we talked with Dr. Steve Harrington who has the company, Flometrics (www.flometrics.com). We received an update on his efforts to market the piston less pump to both traditional aerospace and NewSpace. Steve offers us valuable insights in this world. We also talked about the new space policy proposals, the challenges in getting commercial space customers and much much more. You will find Steve's comments and the information he shares with us to be most valuable and important. If you have questions for either of our guests on these two segments, send them to me at drspace@thespaceshow.com and I will forward them to the respective guest. Selected by: David Livingston [ stations ], Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:35:30 UTC
|
| << < 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 > >> | |